Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. American Nuclear Insurers
84 A.3d 699, 624 Pa. 214
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 24, 2014·No. No. 376 WAL 2013·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 24th day of January 2014, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner is:
(1) Does a policy holder forfeit its right to insurance coverage by settling an underlying and covered claim without its insurer’s consent, where the insurer is defending subject to a reservation of rights to disclaim coverage, the settlement is at arm’s length, is fair and is reason[215]*215able, and the insurer has failed to offer any amounts in settlement?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. American Nuclear Insurers, 84 A.3d 699, 624 Pa. 214 (Pa. 2014).
84 A.3d 699 (Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. American Nuclear Insurers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Babcock & Wilcox Co. v. American Nuclear Insurers
131 A.3d 445 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2015)
Selective Way Insurance v. Hospitality Group Services, Inc.
119 A.3d 1035 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2015)