Babcock v. Stanley

11 Johns. 178
New York Supreme Court·Decided May 15, 1814·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It may be questionable whether the contract for the sale of the service of the negro woman, could be considered as a sale of goods, &c. within the statute for the prevention of frauds: but it was incumbent on the plaintiff below to show a performance on his part, by an offer of the wench to the defendant, before he called upon him for the payment of the money. (2 Saund. Rep. 252. n. 3.) No such offer appears to have been made. The judgment below must, therefore, be reversed.

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Babcock v. Stanley, 11 Johns. 178 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1814).

11 Johns. 178 (Babcock v. Stanley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Glynn v. The City of Oswego
71 Misc. 592 (New York County Courts, 1911)
Johnson v. Watson
1 Ga. 348 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1846)