Babcock v. . Read
1 N.E. 141, 99 N.Y. 609, 54 Sickels 609, 1885 N.Y. LEXIS 830
Opinion
reads for affirmance of order of General Term , and for judgment absolute against defendant on stipulation.
All concur.
Order affirmed and judgment accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Babcock v. . Read, 1 N.E. 141, 99 N.Y. 609, 54 Sickels 609, 1885 N.Y. LEXIS 830 (N.Y. 1885).
1 N.E. 141 (Babcock v. . Read) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shaw v. Shaw
356 F. Supp. 2d 383 (S.D. New York, 2005)
Wooten v. Marshall
153 F. Supp. 759 (S.D. New York, 1957)
Weisner v. Benenson
275 A.D.2d 324 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)
Greenspun v. Roos
48 F. Supp. 281 (E.D. New York, 1942)
Shoemake v. Davis
73 P.2d 1043 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1937)
Davis v. Davis
123 Misc. 504 (New York Supreme Court, 1924)
Columbian Laundry v. Hencken
203 A.D. 140 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)
Edgcomb v. Clough
118 A. 610 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1922)
Hoge v. George
200 P. 96 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1921)
Sonnesyn v. Hawbaker
148 N.W. 476 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1914)
Bond v. Taylor
69 S.E. 1000 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1910)
Jones v. Patrick
140 F. 403 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada, 1905)
Wright v. Smith
105 F. 841 (Second Circuit, 1901)
Felbel v. Kahn
29 A.D. 270 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)
McMillen v. Pratt
62 N.W. 588 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1895)
Ostrander v. Snyder
26 N.Y.S. 263 (New York Supreme Court, 1893)
Bates v. Babcock
16 L.R.A. 745 (California Supreme Court, 1892)