Babcock v. National Surety Co.

106 Misc. 149
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 15, 1919
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 106 Misc. 149 (Babcock v. National Surety Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Babcock v. National Surety Co., 106 Misc. 149 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1919).

Opinion

Davis, J.

This action was brought originally against the Guaranty 'Trust Company of New York to recover the possession of five first mortgage six per cent twenty-five-year sinking fund gold bonds of Wilson & Co., Inc., of the denomination of $1,000 each, with all coupons attached, or in case of failure to so obtain said bonds, for judgment for their value. The action is based upon the plaintiffs’ claim of ownership of five interim certificates purchased by them in good faith for value, which five certificates were part of an issue of $15,000,000 of interim certificates made by the said trust company. The defendant surety company was interpleaded in place of the trust company. In [151]*151the summer of 1916 the Harriman National Bank received for safekeeping from W. W. Davis, one of its depositors, five of these interim certificates numbered M-1574 to M-1578 inclusive, calling for five $1,000 definitive bonds of the Sulzberger & Sons Company, or its successor, Wilson & Co., Inc., Sulzberger & Sons Company having changed its name on or about July 27, 1917. The certificates were placed in an envelope and registered under the name of the said Davis and put in the vaults of the Harriman National Bank. In June, 1916, the customary examination of the securities of the bank was made by Washington M. Logan, alias O. L. Houston, alias William Bower, an employee of Swasey & Co., auditors and accountants, which company had been employed by the bank for the purpose of auditing and checking up all the securities held by the bank and in its possession. On or about August 20, 1916, the Harriman National Bank discovered that these five interim certificates owned by Davis were missing from the vaults of the bank. Later, and about November 2, 1916, an indictment was found against Logan for grand larceny in the first degree and for receiving stolen goods, to wit, the said five interim certificates in question, and on January 29, 1918, Logan, on his plea of guilty, was convicted of grand larceny in the second degree for the theft of the said five interim certificates from the vaults of the Harriman National Bank and was sentenced to serve a term in the state prison. About June 19, 1916, Logan sold these five stolen interim certificates through John Muir & Co., stockbrokers, representing himself to them as William Bower. They were purchased by Siegel & Co., and sold by them to Babcock, Bushton & Co., stockbrokers, the plaintiffs herein. The Guaranty Trust Company of New York having refused to deliver the definitive bonds [152]*152called for by the said interim certificates upon demand by plaintiffs, this action was brought by them against said trust company. After the commencement of the action the Guaranty Trust Company of New York made a motion to substitute the Harriman National Bank and the National Surety Company as defendants in its stead. The Harriman National Bank of New York having disclaimed any interest in the litigation, the National Surety Company was substituted as defendant, and the trust company was directed to hold as custodian the five definitive bonds called for by the said five interim certificates. After the theft of the certificates the Harriman National Bank bought five definitive bonds of Wilson & Co. in the open market and delivered them to Davis in place of the stolen certificates. On November 3, 1916, upon demand of the Harriman National Bank, the defendant surety company paid the said bank the full value of the definitive bonds called for by the stolen certificates. The defendant surety company claims to be subrogated to the right of said Davis and to be entitled to the definitive bonds called for by the stolen certificates. This contention is based upon the fact that on November 5,1915, the said surety company with four other surety companies executed and delivered to the Harriman National Bank a bond to save harmless and indemnify such bank, among other things, against loss by robbery, burglary and theft within the premises of the bank, and that the defendant surety company itself had reimbursed and paid the said bank the full amount of its loss suffered by reason of the theft of said five interim certificates. The plaintiffs contend that these certificates are negotiable instruments, transferable by delivery, and also that they are to be treated the same as the bonds themselves, the temporary symbol and [153]*153equivalent of the bonds represented thereby,” and as the bonds themselves are negotiable, these interim certificates also are. It is undisputed that the plaintiffs were purchasers in good faith and for value of these stolen five interim certificates and without notice of any infirmity in their title or of any equity whatsoever. At the time of the demand by plaintiffs all of the definitive bonds of Wilson & Co., Inc., had been issued and delivered to the Guaranty Trust' Company of New York, and were so issued and delivered to the amount of $8,000,000 on September 26, 1916, and $7,000,000 on September 28, 1916. It appears that Sulzberger & Sons Company, a New York corporation, and the Sulzberger & Sons Company of America, a New Jersey corporation, duly executed and delivered a mortgage and trust deed dated April 1, 1916, and acknowledged April 29, 1916, to the Guaranty Trust Company of New York. This trust mortgage covered certain properties and securities therein specified of the Sulzberger companies and was given to secure the payment of an issue of $25,000,000 first mortgage twenty-five-year sinking fund gold bonds to be issued by the Sulzberger &■ Sons Company, of which amount $15,000,000 were issuable simultaneously with the making of the trust mortgage and $10,000,000 reserved for further issuance. Instead of waiting to have the $15,000,000 worth of bonds engraved the Sulzberger & Sons Company executed and delivered to the Guaranty Trust Company of New York contemporaneously with the trust mortgage, as permitted by the terms thereof, one temporary bond, without coupons, for $15,000,000, dated April 1, 1916, which bond was made exchangeable for the definitive engraved bonds. The temporary bond is in form as follows: ‘ ‘ United States of America. No. Tl. State of New York. $15,000,000. Sulzberger [154]*154& Sons Company. First mortgage six per cent, twenty-five-year sinking fund gold bond, Series A. Temporary bond exchangeable for definitive engraved bonds. Sulzberger & Sons Company, a corporation of the State of New York (hereinafter called the company), for value received, hereby promise to pay to bearer, or if this bond be registered, to the registered holder hereof, on the first day of April, 1941, fifteen million dollars in gold coin of the United States of America of or equal to the standard of weight and fineness as it existed on April 1, 1916, and to pay interest thereon from the first day of April, 1916, at the rate of six per cent, per annum in like gold coin, semi-annually, on the first day of April and the first day of October in each year, upon presentation of this bond for notation hereon of the payment of such interest.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

President v. Morgan
199 A.D. 767 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
106 Misc. 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/babcock-v-national-surety-co-nysupct-1919.