Babcock v. Lipe

1 Denio 139
Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors·Decided May 15, 1845·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court, Jewett, J.

The justice was right in allowing the plaintiff below to add a new count to his declaration. A justice’s court possesses the same power as to amendments as courts of record. (2 R. S. 225, § 1; Brace and others v. Benson, 10 Wend. 213.) There can be no doubt but that a court of record could and would have allowed such amendment in that stage of the cause. (12 Wend. 228; 6 id. 506; 15 id. 557; 20 id. 668.) The defendant below has no ground to complain of hardship or surprise on that account. He had all the opportunity to defend, that he asked for, by means of ad journments after the count was added.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Babcock v. Lipe, 1 Denio 139 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).

1 Denio 139 (Babcock v. Lipe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kidd v. Dougherty
26 N.W. 510 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1886)
Caldwell v. Bruggerman
8 Minn. 286 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1863)
Coon v. Brook
21 Barb. 546 (New York Supreme Court, 1856)