Babby v. Musser

Nebraska Supreme Court

Babby v. Musser

89 N.W. 742, 64 Neb. 175, 1902 Neb. LEXIS 136

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 19, 1902

DocketNo. 11,387

StatusPublished

This text of 89 N.W. 742 (Babby v. Musser) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Babby v. Musser, 89 N.W. 742, 64 Neb. 175, 1902 Neb. LEXIS 136 (Neb. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

Sullivan, C. J.

This was an action of forcible detainer. It was commenced in the county court of Sheridan county, and was tried and decided on April 4, 1899. The judgment was in favor of the plaintiff, John B. Musser. The defendant, William H. Babby, attempted to remove the cause by appeal to the district court. Both parties assumed that the appeal was valid, and the defendant, without challenging the jurisdiction of the court, entered a voluntary appearance, and participated in a trial which resulted in the judgment of which he is now complaining. The decision of the district court can not be approved. At the time of the trial in the county court, there was no valid statute authorizing an appeal in this class of cases. The statute which professed to give that right was not adopted in accordance with constitutional procedure, and in Armstrong v. Mayer, 60 Nebr., 423, was held to be void. The appeal was therefore a nullity; it did not vacate the judgment of the county court, and that judgment has always been, and [176]*176is now, in full force and effect. The case in the district court was, in substance, a new action. Jurisdiction of the parties was acquired by their voluntary appearance; but original jurisdiction of the subject-matter was not given by law, and hence the judgment rendered by the court and brought here for review was, and is, absolutely void.

Note.—The principle underlying the question of jurisdiction by consent is, that one may waive a personal privtheg-e in all eases where public policy is not contravened thereby. Wells, Jurisdiction of Courts, sec. 86. On an appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace, the appellate court acquires no jurisdiction if the subject of the action was beyond the jurisdiction of the justice. Coohan v. Bryant, 36 Wis., 606, 612.—Reporter.

The decision is reversed and the action dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sullivan, C. J.

This was an action of forcible detainer. It was commenced in the county court of Sheridan county, and was tried and decided on April 4, 1899. The judgment was in favor of the plaintiff, John B. Musser. The defendant, William H. Babby, attempted to remove the cause by appeal to the district court. Both parties assumed that the appeal was valid, and the defendant, without challenging the jurisdiction of the court, entered a voluntary appearance, and participated in a trial which resulted in the judgment of which he is now complaining. The decision of the district court can not be approved. At the time of the trial in the county court, there was no valid statute authorizing an appeal in this class of cases. The statute which professed to give that right was not adopted in accordance with constitutional procedure, and in Armstrong v. Mayer, 60 Nebr., 423, was held to be void. The appeal was therefore a nullity; it did not vacate the judgment of the county court, and that judgment has always been, and [176]*176is now, in full force and effect. The case in the district court was, in substance, a new action. Jurisdiction of the parties was acquired by their voluntary appearance; but original jurisdiction of the subject-matter was not given by law, and hence the judgment rendered by the court and brought here for review was, and is, absolutely void.

Note.—The principle underlying the question of jurisdiction by consent is, that one may waive a personal privtheg-e in all eases where public policy is not contravened thereby. Wells, Jurisdiction of Courts, sec. 86. On an appeal from the judgment of a justice of the peace, the appellate court acquires no jurisdiction if the subject of the action was beyond the jurisdiction of the justice. Coohan v. Bryant, 36 Wis., 606, 612.—Reporter.

The decision is reversed and the action dismissed.

Reversed and dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 N.W. 742, 64 Neb. 175, 1902 Neb. LEXIS 136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/babby-v-musser-neb-1902.