Babbit v. De Camp
3 N.J.L. 647
This text of 3 N.J.L. 647 (Babbit v. De Camp) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Babbit v. De Camp, 3 N.J.L. 647 (N.J. 1810).
Opinion
— This case shows the propriety of the rule requiring an actual state of demand, and not merely the evidence of the debt to be delivered [*] the justice. There is nothing in the record of the justice to show that the defendants below were liable to this demand.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
3 N.J.L. 647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/babbit-v-de-camp-nj-1810.