Babbit v. De Camp
3 N.J.L. 647
Opinion
— This case shows the propriety of the rule requiring an actual state of demand, and not merely the evidence of the debt to be delivered [*] the justice. There is nothing in the record of the justice to show that the defendants below were liable to this demand.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Babbit v. De Camp, 3 N.J.L. 647 (N.J. 1810).
3 N.J.L. 647 (Babbit v. De Camp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.