Babb v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Babb v. State

1925 OK CR 367, 237 P. 1117, 31 Okla. Crim. 173, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 353

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 11, 1925

DocketNo. A-4899.

StatusPublished

This text of 1925 OK CR 367 (Babb v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Babb v. State, 1925 OK CR 367, 237 P. 1117, 31 Okla. Crim. 173, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 353 (Okla. Ct. App. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the county court of Garfield county, wherein Arthur Babb was convicted of manufacturing whisky and sentenced to confinement in the county jail for a period of 90 days and to pay a fine of $250. Although the time has long since passed wherein to file briefs in support of this appeal, no briefs have been filed, and the cause has been ordered submitted on the record. An examination of the record discloses that the evidence supports the verdict, that the instructions of the court were fair, and that in all other respects the plaintiff in error was afforded a fair and impartial trial. It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the trial court be and the same is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a judgment of the county court of Garfield county, wherein Arthur Babb was convicted of manufacturing whisky and sentenced to confinement in the county jail for a period of 90 days and to pay a fine of $250. Although the time has long since passed wherein to file briefs in support of this appeal, no briefs have been filed, and the cause has been ordered submitted on the record. An examination of the record discloses that the evidence supports the verdict, that the instructions of the court were fair, and that in all other respects the plaintiff in error was afforded a fair and impartial trial. It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the trial court be and the same is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1925 OK CR 367, 237 P. 1117, 31 Okla. Crim. 173, 1925 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 353, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/babb-v-state-oklacrimapp-1925.