Babb v. State

609 So. 2d 181, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13577, 1992 WL 383007
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 22, 1992·No. No. 92-1430·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Hubert Babb appeals from an order of the trial court revoking his probation. He argues that the trial court erred in accepting his plea of nolo contendere to the alleged violation, in that there was no factual basis for the plea. However, because Babb did not move to withdraw his plea below, the issue he now raises was not preserved for our review. Accordingly, we dismiss the instant appeal. See Stewart v. State, 586 So.2d 449, 451 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

Appeal dismissed.

JOANOS, C.J., and WIGGINTON and WOLF, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Babb v. State, 609 So. 2d 181, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 13577, 1992 WL 383007 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

609 So. 2d 181 (Babb v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. State
677 So. 2d 56 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Wetherbee v. State
634 So. 2d 1160 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)