Babb v. Drug Enforcement Administration

305 F. App'x 148
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 31, 2008
DocketNo. 08-1844
StatusPublished

This text of 305 F. App'x 148 (Babb v. Drug Enforcement Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Babb v. Drug Enforcement Administration, 305 F. App'x 148 (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

David Anthony Babb appeals from the district court’s oral order in this civil forfeiture case denying his motion to void its earlier judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(4). We have reviewed the record and the arguments of the parties and find no reversible error. See Schwartz v. United States, 976 F.2d 213, 217 (4th Cir.1992) (providing standard in Rule 60(b)(4) action). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
305 F. App'x 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/babb-v-drug-enforcement-administration-ca4-2008.