Babb v. Babb
This text of 61 N.H. 142 (Babb v. Babb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff cannot recover in this action on any claim of a homestead right in the land, the homestead not having been assigned; nor in this proceeding could the jury rightfully determine the value of the land. Tidd v. Quinn, 52 N. H. 341, 343.
If the plaintiff can recover at all, it must be by virtue of her title derived from her husband’s conveyance in fee simple; and if that conveyance was in fraud of his creditors, her title fails without regard to the value of the land, and notwithstanding her homestead right. If the conveyance was not fraudulent, the plaintiff’s right of recovery would be clear. If fraudulent, though the question would then arise, whether, in spite of that fact, she would be entitled to a homestead on appropriate proceedings to assign and set it out, she could not recover in this action. The question of fraud in the conveyance was material upon the trial, and the instructions upon the subject were erroneous. The verdict is set aside, and a
New trial granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 N.H. 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/babb-v-babb-nh-1881.