Babb v. Angell
This text of Babb v. Angell (Babb v. Angell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-1122
In Re: MALCOLM MCFALL BABB,
Debtor.
---------------------------
MALCOLM MCFALL BABB,
Debtor – Appellant,
v.
JAMES B. ANGELL,
Trustee – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (7:09-mc-00011-MJH; 06-03003-8-JRL)
Submitted: April 5, 2011 Decided: April 15, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Malcolm McFall Babb, Appellant Pro Se. James Bigelow Angell, HOWARD, STALLINGS, FROM & HUTSON, PA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Malcolm McFall Babb appeals from the district court’s
orders dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court’s order
approving a compromise agreement and denying his motion for
reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error in the district court’s determination
that Babb lacked standing to appeal from the bankruptcy court’s
order. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. In re Babb, Nos. 7:09-mc-00011-MJH; 06-03003-8-
JRL (E.D.N.C. July 12, 2010 & Jan. 12, 2011). We deny as moot
Babb’s motion for a stay of the bankruptcy court’s order pending
appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Babb v. Angell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/babb-v-angell-ca4-2011.