Babb, T., M.D. v. Geisinger Pet: Geisinger
This text of Babb, T., M.D. v. Geisinger Pet: Geisinger (Babb, T., M.D. v. Geisinger Pet: Geisinger) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
M.D. Appeal Dkt. 48 - 2020
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
TERRENCE E. BABB, M.D. : No. 24 MAL 2020 : : v. : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court : GEISINGER CLINIC; PENN STATE : GEISINGER HEALTH SYSTEM; ROBIN E. : OLIVER, M.D.; AND MICHAEL : CHMIELEWSKI, M.D. TERRENCE E. : BABB, M.D. : : : v. : : : GEISINGER CLINIC; GEISINGER HEALTH : SYSTEM : : : PETITION OF: GEISINGER CLINIC :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 17th day of August, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all
remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Whether the Superior Court and trial court erroneously permitted the presumption of at-will employment to be rebutted by a mere preponderance of the evidence, as opposed to by clear and direct evidence, in conflict with established precedent?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Babb, T., M.D. v. Geisinger Pet: Geisinger, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/babb-t-md-v-geisinger-pet-geisinger-pa-2020.