Babb, T., M.D. v. Geisinger Pet: Geisinger

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided August 17, 2020·No. 24 MAL 2020 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

M.D. Appeal Dkt. 48 - 2020

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

TERRENCE E. BABB, M.D. : No. 24 MAL 2020 : :

v. : Petition for Allowance of Appeal : from the Order of the Superior Court :

GEISINGER CLINIC; PENN STATE : GEISINGER HEALTH SYSTEM; ROBIN E. : OLIVER, M.D.; AND MICHAEL : CHMIELEWSKI, M.D. TERRENCE E. : BABB, M.D. : : :

v. : : :

GEISINGER CLINIC; GEISINGER HEALTH : SYSTEM : : :

PETITION OF: GEISINGER CLINIC :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of August, 2020, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all

remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:

Whether the Superior Court and trial court erroneously permitted the presumption of at-will employment to be rebutted by a mere preponderance of the evidence, as opposed to by clear and direct evidence, in conflict with established precedent?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Babb, T., M.D. v. Geisinger Pet: Geisinger, (Pa. 2020).

Babb, T., M.D. v. Geisinger Pet: Geisinger (Babb, T., M.D. v. Geisinger Pet: Geisinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.