Babalola v. Olsten Temporary Staffing Corp.

821 N.E.2d 966, 3 N.Y.3d 752, 788 N.Y.S.2d 661, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 3733
New York Court of Appeals·Decided November 30, 2004·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

[753] Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the proceeding within the meaning of the Constitution. Motion for poor person relief dismissed as academic.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Babalola v. Olsten Temporary Staffing Corp., 821 N.E.2d 966, 3 N.Y.3d 752, 788 N.Y.S.2d 661, 2004 N.Y. LEXIS 3733 (N.Y. 2004).

821 N.E.2d 966 (Babalola v. Olsten Temporary Staffing Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Claim of Francis v. Jewelry Box Corp. of America
128 A.D.3d 1292 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
Claim of Thomas v. Crucible Materials Corp.
73 A.D.3d 1323 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Claim of Bunnell v. Sangerfield Inn
35 A.D.3d 1021 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)