Baan v. Director of Revenue

Missouri Court of Appeals

Baan v. Director of Revenue

980 S.W.2d 1, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1183

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 27, 1997

DocketNo. 71219

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 980 S.W.2d 1 (Baan v. Director of Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Baan v. Director of Revenue, 980 S.W.2d 1, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1183 (Mo. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, the Director of Revenue, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County setting aside the suspension of respondent’s, Bradley A. Baan’s, driving privileges. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, the Director of Revenue, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County setting aside the suspension of respondent’s, Bradley A. Baan’s, driving privileges. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the legal file and find the judgment is supported by sufficient evidence and is not against the weight of the evidence, and no error of law appears. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

980 S.W.2d 1, 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 1183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baan-v-director-of-revenue-moctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack