Baader v. Mascellino
This text of 181 A. 41 (Baader v. Mascellino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal from a decree of the court of chancery dismissing a bill filed to set aside the conveyance of certain lands and the transfer of a mortgage. We have examined the proofs and concur in the conclusion of the learned vice-chancellor that the evidence did not sustain the allegations of the bill. We are, therefore, of the opinion that the bill of complaint was properly dismissed.
The decree is affirmed.
*85 For affirmance —The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Preskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 15.
For reversal —None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
181 A. 41, 119 N.J. Eq. 84, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/baader-v-mascellino-nj-1935.