Baader v. Mascellino

181 A. 41, 119 N.J. Eq. 84, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 595
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Baader v. Mascellino. Read the opinion of the Court — 116 N.J. Eq. 126
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 9, 1935·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an appeal from a decree of the court of chancery dismissing a bill filed to set aside the conveyance of certain lands and the transfer of a mortgage. We have examined the proofs and concur in the conclusion of the learned vice-chancellor that the evidence did not sustain the allegations of the bill. We are, therefore, of the opinion that the bill of complaint was properly dismissed.

The decree is affirmed.

*85 For affirmance —The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Preskie, Van Buskirk, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Rafferty, JJ. 15.

For reversal —None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Baader v. Mascellino, 181 A. 41, 119 N.J. Eq. 84, 1935 N.J. LEXIS 595 (N.J. 1935).

181 A. 41 (Baader v. Mascellino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.