B.A. Berner, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority

219 A.D.2d 803, 632 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10808

Opinion

Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting the petition and annulling the determination of respondent to deny petitioner’s application for an on-premises liquor license. From our review of the record, we conclude that the determination of respondent to deny petitioner the license was a reasonable exercise of its discretion (see, Matter of Zito v State Liq. Auth., 86 AD2d 959; see generally, Matter of Sled Hill Cafe v Hostetter, 22 NY2d 607, 612-613). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Niagara County, Mintz, J. — CPLR art 78.) Present — Denman, P. J., Pine, Wesley, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

B.A. Berner, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority, 219 A.D.2d 803, 632 N.Y.S.2d 1022, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10808 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

219 A.D.2d 803 (B.A. Berner, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Zito v. State Liquor Authority
86 A.D.2d 959 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Sled Hill Cafe, Inc. v. Hostetter
241 N.E.2d 714 (New York Court of Appeals, 1968)