B. Wasserman Co. v. Vaudeville Comedy Club

160 N.Y.S. 1047
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided October 17, 1916·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is complete absence of even an appearance of an intent to violate the judge’s order. An accidental and unintentional violation should not be visited with discipline. The creditor’s rights were in no respect injured and the examination of the debtor was duly completed.

The order appealed from was an abuse of discretion.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

B. Wasserman Co. v. Vaudeville Comedy Club, 160 N.Y.S. 1047 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

160 N.Y.S. 1047 (B. Wasserman Co. v. Vaudeville Comedy Club) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.