B. Wasserman Co. v. Vaudeville Comedy Club

160 N.Y.S. 1047
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedOctober 17, 1916
StatusPublished

This text of 160 N.Y.S. 1047 (B. Wasserman Co. v. Vaudeville Comedy Club) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
B. Wasserman Co. v. Vaudeville Comedy Club, 160 N.Y.S. 1047 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There is complete absence of even an appearance of an intent to violate the judge’s order. An accidental and unintentional violation should not be visited with discipline. The creditor’s rights were in no respect injured and the examination of the debtor was duly completed.

The order appealed from was an abuse of discretion.

Order reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 N.Y.S. 1047, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/b-wasserman-co-v-vaudeville-comedy-club-nyappterm-1916.