B. W. King, Inc. v. McAulay

24 A.D.2d 444, 260 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3746
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 29, 1965·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously modified on the law and the facts to grant plaintiffs an accounting for the profits of defendants’ business in respect to displacement measurement, and as so modified, affirmed, with $50 costs to plaintiffs-respondents-appellants. In this action to enjoin defendants from engaging in the displacement measuring business for scows and barges, we agree with the factual findings of the trial court and that the injunctive provisions of the judgment were well warranted by the proof. However, those same findings also entitle plaintiffs to an accounting for the profits of the business that was wrongfully diverted from them to the defendants (Defler Corp. v. Kleeman, 19 A D 2d 396; Bates Chevrolet Corp. [445] v. Haven Chevrolet, 13 A D 2d 27). Settle order on notice. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Yalente, McNally, Stevens and Steuer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

B. W. King, Inc. v. McAulay, 24 A.D.2d 444, 260 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3746 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

24 A.D.2d 444 (B. W. King, Inc. v. McAulay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Epstein Engineering, P.C. v. Cataldo
124 A.D.3d 420 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)