B. W. Butler, Inc. v. Anderman

279 So. 2d 907, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 8035
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 29, 1973·No. Nos. 72-247, 72-259·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

In an action for personal injuries the jury returned a verdict in favor of all defendants, upon which judgment was entered. The plaintiffs’ timely motion for a new trial was granted, the court finding that the verdict was against the manifest weight of the evidence. It is this order which the defendants have appealed.

Recognizing, as we do, that the trial court exercises a broad discretion in the granting of a motion for new trial on the grounds that the verdict is against the manifest weight of the evidence, and that such ruling should not be disturbed in the absence of a clear showing of abuse, Cloud v. Fallis, Fla.1959, 110 So.2d 669, we have reviewed the record for the purpose of ascertaining whether an abuse of discretion is clearly shown. Russo v. Clark, Fla.1962, 147 So.2d 1. We conclude that it is. The verdict not only is not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence, but is in fact supported by the overwhelming weight of the evidence. The order granting the plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial is reversed and this cause is remanded with directions to reinstate the jury verdict and the judgment thereon.

Reversed and remanded.

WALDEN and OWEN, JJ., concur. MAGER, J., dissents with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

B. W. Butler, Inc. v. Anderman, 279 So. 2d 907, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 8035 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

279 So. 2d 907 (B. W. Butler, Inc. v. Anderman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kelly v. Metropolitan Dade County
370 So. 2d 1243 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)