B. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided April 9, 2020·No. 17-147·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 17-0147V UNPUBLISHED

M.B. and J.B., on behalf of their Minor Chief Special Master Corcoran Child, J.B., Filed: December 20, 2019 Petitioners, v. Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND Stipulation on Damages; Diphtheria HUMAN SERVICES, Tetanus acellular Pertussis (DTaP) Vaccine; Polio Inactivated Virus (IPV) Respondent. Vaccine; Morphea

Andrew Donald Downing, Van Cott & Talamante, PLLC, Phoenix, AZ, for petitioners.

Linda Sara Renzi, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION 1

On January 31, 2017, M.B. and J.B., on behalf of their Minor Child, J.B., filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioners allege that J.B. suffered morphea as a result of receiving the Diphtheria Tetanus acellular Pertussis (“DTaP”) and Polio Inactivated Virus (“IPV”) vaccines on July 27, 2015. Petition at 1-2; Stipulation, filed December 19, 2019, at ¶¶ 2-4. Petitioners further allege that the vaccines were administered in the United States and that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action for damages on behalf of J.B. as a result of her condition. Petition at 1-5; Stipulation at ¶¶ 3-5. “Respondent denies that the vaccines caused J.B. to suffer from morphea or any other injury or her current condition. ” Stipulation at ¶ 6.

1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I am required to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). This means the ruling will be available to anyone with access to the internet. In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), Petitioners have 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will redact such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Nevertheless, on December 19, 2019, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. I find the stipulation reasonable and adopt it as my decision awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, I award the following compensation:

1. A lump sum of $119,050.00, which amount represents compensation for first year life care expenses ($6,550.00), pain and suffering ($112,500.00), in the form of a check payable to Petitioners as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of the estate of J.B. for the benefit of J.B. No payments shall be made until Petitioners provide Respondent with documentation establishing that they have been appointed as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of J.B.’s estate;

2. A lump sum of $50,000.00, which amount represents compensation for past unreimbursable expenses, in the form of a check payable to Petitioners, M.B. and J.B.; and

3. An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in paragraph 10 of the Stipulation, paid to the life insurance company from which the annuity will be purchased (the “Life Insurance Company”).

Stipulation at ¶ 8.

These amounts represent compensation for all items of damages that would be available under § 15(a). Id.

I approve the requested amount for Petitioners’ compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Brian H. Corcoran Brian H. Corcoran Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED ST ATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

and ~ on behalf of their minor child, J.B.,

Petitioners, No. 17-147V Chief Special Master v. Brian H. Corcoran ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

I. On behalf of their daughter, J.B., petitioners filed a petition for vaccine compensation

under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10 to 34 (the

"Vaccine Program"). The petition seeks compensation for injuries allegedly related to J.B.'s

receipt of the DTaP and IPV vaccines, which vaccines are contained in the Vaccine Injury Table

(the "Table"), 42 C.F.R. § 100.3 (a).

2. J.B. received DTaP, IPV, pneumococcal, rotovirus, and HIB immunizations on July

27, 2015.

3. The vaccines were administered within the United States.

4. Petitioners allege that J.B. suffered from morphea as a result of receiving the DTaP

and/or IPV vaccines.

5. Petitioners represent that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages on behalf of J.B. as a result of her condition. 6. Respondent denies that the vaccines caused J.B. to suffer from morphea or any other

injury or her current condition.

7. Maintaining their above-stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry of judgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the tenns of this Stipulation, and after petitioners have filed an election to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2 I (a)(l ), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will issue

the following vaccine compensation payments:

a. A lump sum of $119,050.00, which amount represents compensation for first year life care expenses ($6,550.00), pain and suffering ($112,500.00), in the form of a check payable to petitioners as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of the estate of J.B. for the benefit of J.B. No payments shall be made until petitioners provide respondent with documentation establishing that they have been appointed as guardian(s)/conservator(s) of J.B. 's estate;

b. A lump sum of$50,000.00, which amount represents compensation f~ past unreimbursable expenses, in the fom1 of a check payable to petitioners, ~ and - ~ and

c. An amount sufficient to purchase the annuity contract described in paragraph l 0 below, paid to the life insurance company from which the annuity will be purchased (the "Life Insurance Company").

These amounts represent compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. §300aa-l 5(a).

9.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

B. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2020).

B. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (B. v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g)
§ 300aa-2
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2
§ 300aa-l
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a