B. & S. Prod. Co. v. United States
This text of 36 Cust. Ct. 513 (B. & S. Prod. Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon a stipulation of fact entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.
On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the items of merchandise enumerated in schedule “B,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, and that such values were as set forth in said schedule “B.”
I further find the cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the items of merchandise enumerated [514]*514in schedule “0,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, and that such values were as set forth in said schedule “C.”
Insofar as the appeals relate to all other merchandise, they are hereby dismissed.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Schedule “B”
Items Foreign value
13 DM 6.70 per doz., less 2%, plus cost of cases, as invoiced
21 tt tjr U ft tt it it tt it tt tt (C
22 tt ¶ 7Q tt tt it a u it tt tt tt tt
24 a g 11 tt u u u it it tt it it
25 tt g 0Q tt tt tt tt tt a a tt tt it
28 tt 22 00 U U (< l< li u u 11 11 u
81 a g qq tt tt tt it tt tt tt tt tt tt
82 tt g QQ tt tt tt tt it tt tt tt It tt
91 tt ¶ 25 u u u <( 11 u {< 11 l( u
92 a ¶ 25 11 u u u il li 11 (l u {(
93 ti g yQ tt tt tt tt tt tt tí tt tt tt
94 tt g tt ti tt tt tt tt tt tt tt tt
99 tt 22 go lt u ei e( ce <e 11 (( 11 Ci
Schedule “C”
Items Cost of -production
11 Invoiced unit price, plus cost of cases, as invoiced
12 DM 9.60 per doz., less 41^%, plus cost of cases, as invoiced
14 Invoiced unit price, plus cost of cases, as invoiced
45 DM 9.40 per doz., less 41}¿%, plus cost of cas(es, as invoiced
46 tt Q it tí ti ti tt ti tt t it tt
63 Invoiced unit price, plus cost of cases, as invoiced
66 DM 6.70 per doz., less 41]4,% plus cost of cases, as invoiced
67 it g gQ tt tt tt tt tt tt tt it It tt
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
36 Cust. Ct. 513, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/b-s-prod-co-v-united-states-cusc-1956.