B. R. Smith & Co. v. Ehlen

57 Ga. 610
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 15, 1876·Published

Opinion

Though this court is satisfied with the verdict, and would not, on the evidence in the record, have granted a new trial, it will defer to the judge who presided, not being able to say that he abused the discretion with which he is clothed by law. The first grant of a new trial, where no controlling question of law is involved, is generally to be acquiesced in : ¿4 Georgia Reports, 611; 33 Ibid., 41b ; 3b Ibid., 249,398.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

B. R. Smith & Co. v. Ehlen, 57 Ga. 610 (Ga. 1876).

57 Ga. 610 (B. R. Smith & Co. v. Ehlen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.