B & O Realty Corp. v. Chong-Yau Jeng
This text of 201 A.D.2d 439 (B & O Realty Corp. v. Chong-Yau Jeng) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered August 27, 1992, inter alia, granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Since plaintiff corporation was dissolved, the trial court properly concluded that since plaintiff, as a delinquent corporation, had not sought reinstatement by paying back taxes and penalties, it had no legal capacity to commence this action (Lorisa Capital Corp. v Gallo, 119 AD2d 99, 110). In passing, we note that plaintiff’s contention that the landlord obtained possession of the premises in violation of RPAPL 853 was not raised below and is without merit.
We have considered plaintiff’s remaining contentions and [440]*440find them to be without merit. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ross, Asch, Rubin and Williams, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
201 A.D.2d 439, 609 N.Y.S.2d 776, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1564, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/b-o-realty-corp-v-chong-yau-jeng-nyappdiv-1994.