B & O Realty Corp. v. Chong-Yau Jeng

201 A.D.2d 439, 609 N.Y.S.2d 776, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1564
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 24, 1994·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.), entered August 27, 1992, inter alia, granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Since plaintiff corporation was dissolved, the trial court properly concluded that since plaintiff, as a delinquent corporation, had not sought reinstatement by paying back taxes and penalties, it had no legal capacity to commence this action (Lorisa Capital Corp. v Gallo, 119 AD2d 99, 110). In passing, we note that plaintiff’s contention that the landlord obtained possession of the premises in violation of RPAPL 853 was not raised below and is without merit.

We have considered plaintiff’s remaining contentions and [440]*440find them to be without merit. Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Ross, Asch, Rubin and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

B & O Realty Corp. v. Chong-Yau Jeng, 201 A.D.2d 439, 609 N.Y.S.2d 776, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1564 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

201 A.D.2d 439 (B & O Realty Corp. v. Chong-Yau Jeng) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cloister E., Inc. v. New York State Liq. Auth.
175 N.Y.S.3d 898 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)
Matter of 151st St. Discount Liquors, Inc. v. New York State Liq. Auth.
2020 NY Slip Op 07265 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Metered Appliances, Inc. v. 75 Owners Corp.
225 A.D.2d 338 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)