B & O Radio, Inc. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

Supreme Court of New Jersey

B & O Radio, Inc. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America

184 A. 208, 116 N.J.L. 301, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 250

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 2, 1936·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We agree with the conclusions of Judge Smith that the ease is within the holdings of this court in Domestic Electric Co., Inc., v. Mezzaluna, 109 N. J. L. 574, and Russ Distributing Corp. v. Litchman, 111 Id. 21. To these cases may be added that of Smyth Sales Corp. v. Norfolk Building and Loan Association, 116 Id. 293.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Hetfield, Deae, WolfsKeil, Raffeety, JJ. 9.

For reversal — Bodine, Hehee, Peeskie, Wells, JJ. 4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

We agree with the conclusions of Judge Smith that the ease is within the holdings of this court in Domestic Electric Co., Inc., v. Mezzaluna, 109 N. J. L. 574, and Russ Distributing Corp. v. Litchman, 111 Id. 21. To these cases may be added that of Smyth Sales Corp. v. Norfolk Building and Loan Association, 116 Id. 293.

For affirmance — The Chancelloe, Chief Justice, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Hetfield, Deae, WolfsKeil, Raffeety, JJ. 9.

For reversal — Bodine, Hehee, Peeskie, Wells, JJ. 4.

B & O Radio, Inc. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, 184 A. 208, 116 N.J.L. 301, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 250 (N.J. 1936).

Pincite

184 A. 208 (B & O Radio, Inc. v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related