B & H Miracle, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

227 So. 3d 238, 2017 WL 4526762
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 11, 2017
DocketCASE NO. 1D16-3549
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 227 So. 3d 238 (B & H Miracle, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
B & H Miracle, LLC v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 227 So. 3d 238, 2017 WL 4526762 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellants challenge several aspects of a deficiency judgment. We reverse the award of attorney’s fees for lack of proof, and otherwise affirm the judgment.

Though Appellee claimed to have filed affidavits supporting its plea for attorney’s fees at the hearing, no such affidavits appear in the record. In fact, the record is devoid of any evidence supporting the award of attorney’s fees. In cases such as this where the record contains no competent substantial evidence of fees, the award is properly reversed without remand for taking additional evidence. Freiman v. Nat’l City Mortg. Co., 183 So.3d 1111, 1112-13 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015). Accordingly, we reverse the award of attorney’s fees without allowing further proceedings. We remand only for the trial court to ‘correct the judgment to reflect that the amount of the deficiency is $221,233.50.

KELSEY, WINOKUR, and WINSOR, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ali v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
264 So. 3d 1096 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
227 So. 3d 238, 2017 WL 4526762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/b-h-miracle-llc-v-wells-fargo-bank-na-fladistctapp-2017.