B & H Co. v. Moss

New Mexico Supreme Court

B & H Co. v. Moss

555 P.2d 372, 89 N.M. 549

CourtNew Mexico Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 22, 1976

DocketNo. 11092

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 555 P.2d 372 (B & H Co. v. Moss) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

B & H Co. v. Moss, 555 P.2d 372, 89 N.M. 549 (N.M. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

DECISION

McMANUS, Justice.

The decision of the Court of Appeals recalling the original mandate of July 29, 1976, and issuing an amended mandate on August 9, 1976, 89 N.M. 558, 555 P.2d 381, to include an award of costs to appellant is reversed. The cost bill was not submitted until after the mandate had been issued and therefore the Court of Appeals lost jurisdiction over the case. See In the Matter of the Protest of Miller, 89 N.M. 547, 555 P.2d 142 (1976).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

OMAN, C. J., and MONTOYA, SOSA and EASLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION

McMANUS, Justice.

The decision of the Court of Appeals recalling the original mandate of July 29, 1976, and issuing an amended mandate on August 9, 1976, 89 N.M. 558, 555 P.2d 381, to include an award of costs to appellant is reversed. The cost bill was not submitted until after the mandate had been issued and therefore the Court of Appeals lost jurisdiction over the case. See In the Matter of the Protest of Miller, 89 N.M. 547, 555 P.2d 142 (1976).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

OMAN, C. J., and MONTOYA, SOSA and EASLEY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

555 P.2d 372, 89 N.M. 549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/b-h-co-v-moss-nm-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack