B & H Co. v. Moss

555 P.2d 372, 89 N.M. 549
New Mexico Supreme Court·Decided September 22, 1976·No. No. 11092·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

DECISION

McMANUS, Justice.

The decision of the Court of Appeals recalling the original mandate of July 29, 1976, and issuing an amended mandate on August 9, 1976, 89 N.M. 558, 555 P.2d 381, to include an award of costs to appellant is reversed. The cost bill was not submitted until after the mandate had been issued and therefore the Court of Appeals lost jurisdiction over the case. See In the Matter of the Protest of Miller, 89 N.M. 547, 555 P.2d 142 (1976).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

OMAN, C. J., and MONTOYA, SOSA and EASLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

B & H Co. v. Moss, 555 P.2d 372, 89 N.M. 549 (N.M. 1976).

555 P.2d 372 (B & H Co. v. Moss) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Robison v. Campbell
661 P.2d 479 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1983)