B. Forman Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

B. Forman Co. v. United States

53 Cust. Ct. 465, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2274

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedNovember 4, 1964

DocketReap. Dec. 10840; Entry No. 1383, etc.

StatusPublished

This text of 53 Cust. Ct. 465 (B. Forman Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

B. Forman Co. v. United States, 53 Cust. Ct. 465, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2274 (cusc 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision, upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise, consisting of cashmere outerwear, manufactured by firms shown in Schedule “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof, involved in the reappraisement appeals listed in said Schedule “A” is such or similar, and the issues are in all material respects the same as the merchandise and issues in Charles Stockheimer, et al. v. United States, etc., 44 C.C.P.A. (Customs) 92, C.A.D. 642, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.

That there was no foreign value, export value, or United States value, as defined in Section 402 (c), (d), and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, for the involved merchandise at the time of exportation thereof.

That the cost of production, as defined in Section 402(f) of said Act, is the proper basis for appraisement of the involved merchandise, and that such cost of production for each of the item numbers or other description shown on the invoices involved in each of the appeals listed in said Schedule “A” is as stated in said Schedule “A” attached hereto' and made a part of this stipulation, for the merchandise exported during the specified periods.

That the appeals are abandoned as to all merchandise on the invoices involved in said Schedule “A” for which no value is shown in Schedule “A”.

That the appeals listed in said Schedule “A” are submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts, I find and hold cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1980, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such value for the items of merchandise involved in these appeals during the periods specified was as stated in said schedule “A,” attached hereto, all prices net, per piece, parcel post packing, if any, included, cases extra, as invoiced. As to all other merchandise, the appeals herein are dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision, upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise, consisting of cashmere outerwear, manufactured by firms shown in Schedule “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof, involved in the reappraisement appeals listed in said Schedule “A” is such or similar, and the issues are in all material respects the same as the merchandise and issues in Charles Stockheimer, et al. v. United States, etc., 44 C.C.P.A. (Customs) 92, C.A.D. 642, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.

That there was no foreign value, export value, or United States value, as defined in Section 402 (c), (d), and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, for the involved merchandise at the time of exportation thereof.

That the cost of production, as defined in Section 402(f) of said Act, is the proper basis for appraisement of the involved merchandise, and that such cost of production for each of the item numbers or other description shown on the invoices involved in each of the appeals listed in said Schedule “A” is as stated in said Schedule “A” attached hereto' and made a part of this stipulation, for the merchandise exported during the specified periods.

That the appeals are abandoned as to all merchandise on the invoices involved in said Schedule “A” for which no value is shown in Schedule “A”.

That the appeals listed in said Schedule “A” are submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On tbe agreed facts, I find and hold cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1980, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such value for the items of merchandise involved in these appeals during the periods specified was as stated in said schedule “A,” attached hereto, all prices net, per piece, parcel post packing, if any, included, cases extra, as invoiced. As to all other merchandise, the appeals herein are dismissed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 Cust. Ct. 465, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/b-forman-co-v-united-states-cusc-1964.