B. F. Goodrich Rubber Co. v. Alexander

229 A.D. 737

This text of 229 A.D. 737 (B. F. Goodrich Rubber Co. v. Alexander) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
B. F. Goodrich Rubber Co. v. Alexander, 229 A.D. 737 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Order in so far as it opens defendant’s default and permits the service of an answer modified by striking out the words “ to abide the event ” as the same relates to the allowance of fifteen dollars costs. As so modified, the order is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to respondent; answer to be served within ten days from service of a copy of the order herein. It was error to direct that costs of the motion should abide the event. (Richardson v. Sun Publishing Co., 20 App. Div. 329.) Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Kapper and Scudder, JJ., concur; Hagarty, J., dissents and votes to reverse.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Richardson v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n
20 A.D. 329 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
229 A.D. 737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/b-f-goodrich-rubber-co-v-alexander-nyappdiv-1930.