B. F. Gladding & Co. v. Pierson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

B. F. Gladding & Co. v. Pierson

271 A.D.2d 1043

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 12, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 271 A.D.2d 1043 (B. F. Gladding & Co. v. Pierson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

B. F. Gladding & Co. v. Pierson, 271 A.D.2d 1043 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Madison County Special Term, which denied a motion by the defendant-appellant Necrason to dismiss the complaint herein. The action is to recover moneys alleged to have been obtained from the plaintiff by means of fraud and deception on the part of the defendants. The complaint in our opinion states a good cause of action. Order affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Madison County Special Term, which denied a motion by the defendant-appellant Necrason to dismiss the complaint herein. The action is to recover moneys alleged to have been obtained from the plaintiff by means of fraud and deception on the part of the defendants. The complaint in our opinion states a good cause of action. Order affirmed, with $25 costs and disbursements. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 A.D.2d 1043, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/b-f-gladding-co-v-pierson-nyappdiv-1947.