B. E. La Dow & Co. v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

B. E. La Dow & Co. v. Wilson

1921 OK 283, 200 P. 156, 82 Okla. 238, 1921 Okla. LEXIS 256

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedJuly 12, 1921

Docket10264

StatusPublished

This text of 1921 OK 283 (B. E. La Dow & Co. v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

B. E. La Dow & Co. v. Wilson, 1921 OK 283, 200 P. 156, 82 Okla. 238, 1921 Okla. LEXIS 256 (Okla. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

*239 KENNAMER, J.

This is an appeal from the district court of Kay county by B. E. La Dow & Company, plaintiff in error, against Joseph W: "Wilson, A. A. McFall, and Charles M.. Baird, as defendants in error.

This cause was set for hearing on the 21)st day of June, 1021. No appearance was made on behalf of the plaintiff in error, and no brief has been filed by plaintiff in error nor excuse presented to the court why the cause has not been briefed on behalf of the plaintiff in error. Under rule No. 7 of this court (47 Okla. vi) the appeal is subject to dismissal. It is, therefore, ordered by the court that the appeal herein be, and the same is dismissed.

PITCHFORD. V. C. J., and MILLER, ELTING, and NICHOLSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*239 KENNAMER, J.

This is an appeal from the district court of Kay county by B. E. La Dow & Company, plaintiff in error, against Joseph W: "Wilson, A. A. McFall, and Charles M.. Baird, as defendants in error.

This cause was set for hearing on the 21)st day of June, 1021. No appearance was made on behalf of the plaintiff in error, and no brief has been filed by plaintiff in error nor excuse presented to the court why the cause has not been briefed on behalf of the plaintiff in error. Under rule No. 7 of this court (47 Okla. vi) the appeal is subject to dismissal. It is, therefore, ordered by the court that the appeal herein be, and the same is dismissed.

PITCHFORD. V. C. J., and MILLER, ELTING, and NICHOLSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1921 OK 283, 200 P. 156, 82 Okla. 238, 1921 Okla. LEXIS 256, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/b-e-la-dow-co-v-wilson-okla-1921.