B. Blumenthal & Co. v. United States

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

B. Blumenthal & Co. v. United States

135 F. 254, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 5196

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedNovember 11, 1904

DocketNo. 3,541

StatusPublished

This text of 135 F. 254 (B. Blumenthal & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

B. Blumenthal & Co. v. United States, 135 F. 254, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 5196 (circtsdny 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

HAZEL, District Judge.

The importation consists of rhinestones. They are properly classified as manufactures of metal and paste, of which paste (the rhinestone) is the component material of chief value. They are therefore assessable for duty under paragraph 112 (Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule B, 30 Stat. 158 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1635]). The importers claim that the merchandise consists of glass buttons, and should be assessed at three-fourths of 1 cent, per line per gross, and in addition thereto 15 per centum ad valorem, under paragraph 414 of the present tariff act (Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule N, 30 Stat. 190 [U. S. Comp. St. p. 1674]). This paragraph specifically mentions “buttons made of glass or metal.” It is not disputed that paste is a species of glass, but it is quite clear, as stated in the opinion of the Board of General Appraisers, that Congress has differentiated paste as a separate substance, and has provided a specific duty for manufactures thereof. Moreover, the articles are not strictly buttons, but, according to the evidence, are merely used to decorate and ornament women’s outer apparel, such as gowns, waists, etc.

The opinion of the Board of General Appraisers is sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HAZEL, District Judge.

The importation consists of rhinestones. They are properly classified as manufactures of metal and paste, of which paste (the rhinestone) is the component material of chief value. They are therefore assessable for duty under paragraph 112 (Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule B, 30 Stat. 158 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1635]). The importers claim that the merchandise consists of glass buttons, and should be assessed at three-fourths of 1 cent, per line per gross, and in addition thereto 15 per centum ad valorem, under paragraph 414 of the present tariff act (Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 1, Schedule N, 30 Stat. 190 [U. S. Comp. St. p. 1674]). This paragraph specifically mentions “buttons made of glass or metal.” It is not disputed that paste is a species of glass, but it is quite clear, as stated in the opinion of the Board of General Appraisers, that Congress has differentiated paste as a separate substance, and has provided a specific duty for manufactures thereof. Moreover, the articles are not strictly buttons, but, according to the evidence, are merely used to decorate and ornament women’s outer apparel, such as gowns, waists, etc.

The opinion of the Board of General Appraisers is sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

135 F. 254, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 5196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/b-blumenthal-co-v-united-states-circtsdny-1904.