B. Bennett, an Individual, D.B.A. Universal Sound Movie Company v. William E. Brown and C. H. Brown, D.B.A. Perfection Packaging Company

Sixth Circuit

B. Bennett, an Individual, D.B.A. Universal Sound Movie Company v. William E. Brown and C. H. Brown, D.B.A. Perfection Packaging Company

216 F.2d 956, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3062

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedOctober 25, 1954

Docket12069

StatusPublished

This text of 216 F.2d 956 (B. Bennett, an Individual, D.B.A. Universal Sound Movie Company v. William E. Brown and C. H. Brown, D.B.A. Perfection Packaging Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

B. Bennett, an Individual, D.B.A. Universal Sound Movie Company v. William E. Brown and C. H. Brown, D.B.A. Perfection Packaging Company, 216 F.2d 956, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3062 (6th Cir. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from a judgment entered against the defendant (no appellant), awarding damages for breach of contract, has been heard and duly considered upon the record, and upon oral arguments and briefs of the attorneys;

*957 And it appearing that the findings of fact upon which the judgment was based are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous, and that the conclusions of law of the District Court were correctly drawn;

The judgment is affirmed, upon the reasoning of the District Judge in his oral opinion, delivered from the bench; and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from a judgment entered against the defendant (no appellant), awarding damages for breach of contract, has been heard and duly considered upon the record, and upon oral arguments and briefs of the attorneys;

*957 And it appearing that the findings of fact upon which the judgment was based are supported by substantial evidence and are not clearly erroneous, and that the conclusions of law of the District Court were correctly drawn;

The judgment is affirmed, upon the reasoning of the District Judge in his oral opinion, delivered from the bench; and it is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 F.2d 956, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 3062, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/b-bennett-an-individual-dba-universal-sound-movie-company-v-william-ca6-1954.