B. B. M. Photocopy Mfg. Corp. v. United States
57 Cust. Ct. 70, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1845
Opinion
When this case was called for trial, there was no appearance on behalf of the plaintiffs, and defendant moved to dismiss the protest for lack of prosecution.
It appearing from the official papers that the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it is dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
B. B. M. Photocopy Mfg. Corp. v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 70, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1845 (cusc 1966).
57 Cust. Ct. 70 (B. B. M. Photocopy Mfg. Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.