B. B. & D. Productions, Inc. v. Screen Gems, Inc.

29 A.D.2d 747, 287 N.Y.S.2d 615, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4666
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 15, 1968
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 29 A.D.2d 747 (B. B. & D. Productions, Inc. v. Screen Gems, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
B. B. & D. Productions, Inc. v. Screen Gems, Inc., 29 A.D.2d 747, 287 N.Y.S.2d 615, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4666 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Opinion

Order, entered September 25, 1967, unanimously modified, on the law and the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, to provide that the parties shall pay their respective expenses incurred in the plaintifE’s taking of the deposition of the defendant Raybert Productions, Inc., in California, and that a party ultimately succeeding in the action, if entitled to taxable costs, may tax and recover the expense incurred as a taxable disbursement; and the order is otherwise affirmed, without costs and disbursements. Inasmuch as the notice of deposition requires the production, for use on the examination, of considerable correspondence, records and other papers located at the defendant corporation’s home office in California and in the special circumstances of this ease, it was proper to direct that the examination be held in such State, either by written interrogatories or by open commission at plaintiff’s election. However, it was improper to direct that the plaintiff pay the entire expense of the taking of the deposition. (See WalborsJcy v. Wolf, 28 A D 2d 1120; Pakter v. Lilly & Go., 19 A D 2d 810; Jemberg v. Virtis Co., 17 A D 2d 892.) Concur — Botein, P. J., Stevens, Eager, Tilzer and Rabin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Levine v. St. Luke's Hospital Center
109 A.D.2d 694 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Carborundum Environmental Systems Canada, Ltd. v. Nitec Paper Corp.
69 A.D.2d 981 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 A.D.2d 747, 287 N.Y.S.2d 615, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/b-b-d-productions-inc-v-screen-gems-inc-nyappdiv-1968.