B. A. McKenzie & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

B. A. McKenzie & Co. v. United States

33 Cust. Ct. 398, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 848

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in B. A. McKenzie & Co. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 39 Cust. Ct. 52 →

United States Customs Court·Decided October 28, 1954·No. No. 58449; protests 142702-K, etc. (Seattle)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of internal-combustion engines the same in all material respects as the articles involved in Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. v. United States (41 C. C. P. A. 33, C. A. D. 525), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. It was held that the value of the items involved is the percentage of the appraised value of said power saws, as noted in green ink, on the invoices by the examiner.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of internal-combustion engines the same in all material respects as the articles involved in Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. v. United States (41 C. C. P. A. 33, C. A. D. 525), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. It was held that the value of the items involved is the percentage of the appraised value of said power saws, as noted in green ink, on the invoices by the examiner.

B. A. McKenzie & Co. v. United States, 33 Cust. Ct. 398, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 848 (cusc 1954).

Pincite

33 Cust. Ct. 398 (B. A. McKenzie & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.