Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/B. A. D. v. State

B. A. D. v. State

379 So. 2d 1311, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15954
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 13, 1980
DocketNos. PP-214, PP-215
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 379 So. 2d 1311 (B. A. D. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
B. A. D. v. State, 379 So. 2d 1311, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15954 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The restitution order attending this probation for the two minor appellants is not erroneous for requiring each to repay $172.00, one-third of the aggregate thefts by appellants and another using the same credit card. Assuming that, an evidentiary hearing is not required on the amount of each child’s separate charges on the card. The words “or such other amount deemed due by the probation counselor” are stricken from the order, which is otherwise

AFFIRMED.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., LARRY G. SMITH and WENTWORTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pollreisz v. State
406 So. 2d 1297 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
379 So. 2d 1311, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 15954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/b-a-d-v-state-fladistctapp-1980.