Azzollini v. Watkins

81 F. Supp. 127, 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1836
CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedOctober 18, 1948
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 81 F. Supp. 127 (Azzollini v. Watkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Azzollini v. Watkins, 81 F. Supp. 127, 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1836 (S.D.N.Y. 1948).

Opinion

COXE, District Judge.

These are motions by the defendant in the three above-entitled proceedings to dismiss the petitions on the ground that they fail to state claims upon which relief "can be granted.

The petitioners ask that proceedings instituted for their deportation, and which have resulted in orders for deportation, be reviewed by this court under Section 10 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U. S.C.A. § 1009, and that pending such review the proceedings be stayed.

In my opinion the Administrative Procedure Act has no application to such proceedings. But, assuming that it has, the petitions fail to allege facts showing that the petitioners are “suffering legal wrong” because of the proceedings. With the exception of a few unimportant facts, the petitions contain only conclusory allegations — it is not shown when, or how, the petitioners entered the United States, nor does it appear what the asserted grounds for their deportation are.

The motions of the defendants to dismiss the three petitions are in all respects granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Yanish v. Wixon
81 F. Supp. 499 (N.D. California, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
81 F. Supp. 127, 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/azzollini-v-watkins-nysd-1948.