Azzar v. City of Grand Rapids
725 N.W.2d 666, 477 Mich. 995
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Azzar v. City of Grand Rapids. Read the opinion of the Court — 474 Mich. 1133 →
Opinion
James D. AZZAR, Plaintiff-Appellant, and
Processing Solutions, Limited, Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF GRAND RAPIDS, Defendant-Appellee, and
Bernard C. Schaefer, and Robert J. Kruis, Defendants.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, leave to appeal having been granted and the briefs and oral arguments of the parties having been considered by the Court, we VACATE our order of May 4, 2006. The application for leave to appeal the September 22, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is DENIED, because we are no longer persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Azzar v. City of Grand Rapids, 725 N.W.2d 666, 477 Mich. 995 (Mich. 2007).
725 N.W.2d 666 (Azzar v. City of Grand Rapids) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.