Azurin v. State
This text of 256 So. 3d 900 (Azurin v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed.
Gerber, C.J. and May, J., concur.
Ciklin, J., concurs with opinion.
*901I concur in the decision to affirm. I write to draw attention to a problem presented somewhat regularly in the cases that come before this court: trial counsel's failure to preserve error. In this case, the lack of preservation was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. This is not always the case.
Non-specific and non-articulated evidentiary objections by any party to a proceeding are categorically unacceptable and the profession should be alarmed at the frequency with which this lack of basic legal acumen takes place.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
256 So. 3d 900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/azurin-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.