Azule v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

829 So. 2d 274, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 13925, 2002 WL 31114566
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 25, 2002·No. No. 3D01-2995·Published

Opinion

SHEVIN, J.

We reverse the order denying appellant unemployment benefits. Appellant did not appear at the hearing, and the record demonstrates that the notice of hearing was not sent to her current address. As failure to provide notice to a current address is a due process violation, see Oliver v. Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 616 So.2d 1088 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); see also Brennan v. Paul Barabas Interiors, 357 So.2d 746 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978), we reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing concerning this issue. If the referee determines that notice was improperly mailed, the referee shall conduct a new hearing on the merits of appellant’s claim.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Azule v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 829 So. 2d 274, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 13925, 2002 WL 31114566 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

829 So. 2d 274 (Azule v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Oliver v. UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COM'N
616 So. 2d 1088 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Brennan v. Paul Barabas Interiors
357 So. 2d 746 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1978)