Azoplate Corp. v. United States

54 Cust. Ct. 464, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1841
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJune 16, 1965
DocketNo. 69377; protest 63/16258 (New York)
StatusPublished

This text of 54 Cust. Ct. 464 (Azoplate Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Azoplate Corp. v. United States, 54 Cust. Ct. 464, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1841 (cusc 1965).

Opinion

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the item of merchandise, designated on the invoice as “Diazo Diphenylamine (Para-Diazo Diphenylamine Sulfate 97.8%),” consists of azo salts, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
54 Cust. Ct. 464, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1841, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/azoplate-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1965.