Azmoe v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Azmoe v. State

687 So. 2d 70, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 397, 1997 WL 43645

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 5, 1997

DocketNo. 96-2800

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 687 So. 2d 70 (Azmoe v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Azmoe v. State, 687 So. 2d 70, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 397, 1997 WL 43645 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Ricky Allen Azmoe appeals the trial court’s denial of Ms motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, wherein he sought to withdraw his plea on the basis that section 33-11.0065(1), Florida Administrative Code, deprived him of his plea bargain as the rule revised the gain time laws to Ms detriment. Rule 33-11.0065(1), Florida Administrative Code, was held invalid during the pendency of tMs appeal, thus rendering the issue moot. Gwong v. Singletary, 683 So.2d 109 (Fla.1996). Azmoe is free to pursue his admimstrative remedy to obtain reinstatement of his gain time. Accordingly, Ms appeal is demed without prejudice to pursue that relief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Ricky Allen Azmoe appeals the trial court’s denial of Ms motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, wherein he sought to withdraw his plea on the basis that section 33-11.0065(1), Florida Administrative Code, deprived him of his plea bargain as the rule revised the gain time laws to Ms detriment. Rule 33-11.0065(1), Florida Administrative Code, was held invalid during the pendency of tMs appeal, thus rendering the issue moot. Gwong v. Singletary, 683 So.2d 109 (Fla.1996). Azmoe is free to pursue his admimstrative remedy to obtain reinstatement of his gain time. Accordingly, Ms appeal is demed without prejudice to pursue that relief.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

687 So. 2d 70, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 397, 1997 WL 43645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/azmoe-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack