Azeez v. Keller
This text of 510 F. App'x 296 (Azeez v. Keller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Jamal A. Azeez appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (2006) complaint and denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and Azeez’s claims and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Azeez v. Keller, No. 5:06-cv-00106, 2012 WL 3231323 (S.D.W.Va. Aug. 6 & 31, 2012). We deny Azeez’s motion to stay the appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
510 F. App'x 296, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/azeez-v-keller-ca4-2013.