Azeez v. Keller

Fourth Circuit

Azeez v. Keller

510 F. App'x 296

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 25, 2013·No. No. 12-2129·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jamal A. Azeez appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (2006) complaint and denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and Azeez’s claims and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Azeez v. Keller, No. 5:06-cv-00106, 2012 WL 3231323 (S.D.W.Va. Aug. 6 & 31, 2012). We deny Azeez’s motion to stay the appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jamal A. Azeez appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (2006) complaint and denying his motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and Azeez’s claims and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Azeez v. Keller, No. 5:06-cv-00106, 2012 WL 3231323 (S.D.W.Va. Aug. 6 & 31, 2012). We deny Azeez’s motion to stay the appeal and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Azeez v. Keller, 510 F. App'x 296 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

510 F. App'x 296 (Azeez v. Keller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related