Azeez v. John/Jane Doe

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedJune 14, 2023
Docket7:22-cv-06028
StatusUnknown

This text of Azeez v. John/Jane Doe (Azeez v. John/Jane Doe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Azeez v. John/Jane Doe, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ABDOOL AZEEZ, 22-CV-6028 (LTS) Petitioner. ORDER LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: Petitioner Abdool Azeez proceeds in this matter pro se. He seeks to challenge a state court conviction, but he does not identify the conviction. By order dated September 19, 2022, the Court directed Petitioner to complete a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 form, which was attached to the September 19, 2022, order, following Petitioner’s request that the court provide him with a

Section 2254 form. On October 14, 2022, the court’s Clerk’s Office received a letter from Petitioner, in which he stated that he did not intend to file his Section 2254 petition at that time. Rather, he stated, he was merely requesting that the Clerk’s Office provide him with a Section 2254 form, indicating that he was exhausting his unexhausted constitutional claims in the state courts, with the intent to return to this court upon completion of that exhaustion. Accordingly, on October 24, 2022, the Court denied the petition without prejudice to any Section 2254 petition Petitioner filed following his exhaustion in the state courts of his constitutional claims. On June 1, 2023, the Court received a letter from Petitioner, stating, “I do not know how to prepare my federal habeas corpus petition and I am kindly asking your honor if you can please assign me an attorney to prepare and file[ ] my federal corpus petition.” (ECF 11.)

As discussed below, the Court denies without prejudice Petitioner’s request for the appointment of counsel but grants him 60 days to complete the attached Section 2254 form. DISCUSSION A. Appointment of Counsel Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There is no constitutional right to counsel in habeas corpus proceedings. Where a court “determines that the interests of justice so require, representation may be provided for any financially eligible person who . . . is seeking relief under section 2241, 2254, or 2255 of title 28.” 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B) (the Criminal

Justice Act (“CJA”)). In deciding whether to exercise its discretion to appoint counsel under the CJA, courts in this Circuit consider the same factors as those applicable to requests for pro bono counsel in other civil actions. See, e.g., Zimmerman v. Burge, 492 F. Supp. 2d 170, 176 n.1 (E.D.N.Y. 2007) (citing Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co., 877 F.2d 170, 172 (2d Cir. 1989)); In re Pizzuti, 10 Civ. 199, 2010 WL 4968244, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 7, 2010). Those factors include the likelihood of success on the merits, the complexity of the legal issues, and the movant’s ability to investigate and present the case. See Cooper, 877 F.2d at 172; Hodge v. Police Officers, 802 F.2d 58, 61-62 (2d Cir. 1986). The Court has considered these factors and finds that appointment of counsel is not warranted at this time because Petitioner has not submitted a petition to determine whether the

appointment of counsel is warranted. Accordingly, the request for the appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice. Petitioner may reapply for appointment of counsel after he has submitted his completed Section 2254 form. B. Order to Reopen The Court construes Petitioner’s June 1, 2023, letter, dated May 29, 2023, as including a motion to reopen this action. The Court grants the request and directs the Clerk of Court to vacate the order of dismissal and the civil judgment. (ECF 8-9.) The Court also grants Petitioner 60 days to complete and submit the attached Section 2254 form. At this stage, Petitioner is only required to: (1) include the date his judgment of conviction was rendered and by which court, (2) the dates he filed his direct appeal and any post-conviction motions, (3) the dates his appeal and any post-conviction motions were decided, and (4) the grounds he seeks to raise in his Section 2254 petition, including any grounds he raised on direct appeal or in any post-conviction motion. If Petitioner believes that his petition is untimely, he must provide reasons why he did

not submit his petition on time. Petitioner is not required to provide any arguments at this stage; he must simply complete the attached form. CONCLUSION The Court directs the Clerk of Court to vacate the order of dismissal and the civil judgment. (ECF 8-9.) The Court also directs the Clerk of Court to reopen this action. The Court grants Petitioner 60 days from the date of this order to complete the attached Section 2254 form. The form must be submitted to the Clerk’s Office within 60 days of the date of this order, be captioned as an “Amended Petition,” and bear the same docket number as this order. A Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 form is attached to this order, which Petitioner should complete as

specified above. The Court denies Petitioner’s request for the appointment of counsel (ECF 11), without prejudice to renewal. SO ORDERED. Dated: June 14, 2023 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge Petition for Relief From a Conviction or Sentence By a Person in State Custody (Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus) Instructions 1. To use this form, you must be a person who is currently serving a sentence under a judgment against you in a state court. You are asking for relief from the conviction or the sentence. This form is your petition for relief. 2. You may also use this form to challenge a state judgment that imposed a sentence to be served in the future, but you must fill in the name of the state where the judgment was entered. If you want to challenge a federal judgment that imposed a sentence to be served in the future, you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 in the federal court that entered the judgment. 3. Make sure the form is typed or neatly written. 4. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of a material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury. 5. Answer all the questions. You do not need to cite law. You may submit additional pages if necessary. If you do not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional or correct information. If you want to submit a brief or arguments, you must submit them in a separate memorandum. 6. You must pay a fee of $5. If the fee is paid, your petition will be filed. If you cannot pay the fee, you may ask to proceed in forma pauperis (as a poor person). To do that, you must fill out the last page of this form. Also, you must submit a certificate signed by an officer at the institution where you are confined showing the amount of money that the institution is holding for you. If your account exceeds $ , you must pay the filing fee. 7. In this petition, you may challenge the judgment entered by only one court. If you want to challenge a judgment entered by a different court (either in the same state or in different states), you must file a separate petition. 8.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bennie Cooper v. A. Sargenti Co., Inc.
877 F.2d 170 (Second Circuit, 1989)
Zimmerman v. Burge
492 F. Supp. 2d 170 (E.D. New York, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Azeez v. John/Jane Doe, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/azeez-v-johnjane-doe-nysd-2023.