Azco Realty, Inc. v. Village at Gulfstream Park

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Azco Realty, Inc. v. Village at Gulfstream Park

152 So. 3d 690

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedNovember 19, 2014

DocketNos. 3D14-0984, 3D14-0005

StatusPublished

This text of 152 So. 3d 690 (Azco Realty, Inc. v. Village at Gulfstream Park) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Azco Realty, Inc. v. Village at Gulfstream Park, 152 So. 3d 690 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Geneva Inv., Ltd. v. Trafalgar Developers, Ltd., 274 So.2d 581 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Bradley v. Banks, 260 So.2d 256, 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972) (“The appellee was entitled to summary [691]*691judgment on plaintiffs’ claim for a portion of a real estate commission because there was no genuine issue of material fact concerning the proposition that [plaintiff-appellant] was not registered as a real estate broker or salesman at the time the act or service was performed.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Geneva Inv., Ltd. v. Trafalgar Developers, Ltd., 274 So.2d 581 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Bradley v. Banks, 260 So.2d 256, 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972) (“The appellee was entitled to summary [691]*691judgment on plaintiffs’ claim for a portion of a real estate commission because there was no genuine issue of material fact concerning the proposition that [plaintiff-appellant] was not registered as a real estate broker or salesman at the time the act or service was performed.”).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

152 So. 3d 690, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/azco-realty-inc-v-village-at-gulfstream-park-fladistctapp-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack