Azco Realty, Inc. v. Village at Gulfstream Park

152 So. 3d 690
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 19, 2014·No. Nos. 3D14-0984, 3D14-0005·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Geneva Inv., Ltd. v. Trafalgar Developers, Ltd., 274 So.2d 581 (Fla. 3d DCA 1973); Bradley v. Banks, 260 So.2d 256, 256 (Fla. 3d DCA 1972) (“The appellee was entitled to summary [691]*691judgment on plaintiffs’ claim for a portion of a real estate commission because there was no genuine issue of material fact concerning the proposition that [plaintiff-appellant] was not registered as a real estate broker or salesman at the time the act or service was performed.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Azco Realty, Inc. v. Village at Gulfstream Park, 152 So. 3d 690 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

152 So. 3d 690 (Azco Realty, Inc. v. Village at Gulfstream Park) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

GENEVA INVEST., LTD. v. Trafalgar Developers, Ltd.
274 So. 2d 581 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Bradley v. Banks
260 So. 2d 256 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)