Ayyoub Younes Wazwaz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

48 F.3d 1226, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11601, 1995 WL 72308
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 23, 1995
Docket94-2610
StatusPublished

This text of 48 F.3d 1226 (Ayyoub Younes Wazwaz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ayyoub Younes Wazwaz v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 48 F.3d 1226, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11601, 1995 WL 72308 (8th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

48 F.3d 1226
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

Ayyoub Younes WAZWAZ, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondents.

No. 94-2610.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Feb. 16, 1995.
Filed: Feb. 23, 1995.

Board of Immigration Appeals

B.I.A.

AFFIRMED

Before FAGG, MAGILL, and LOKEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Ayyoub Younes Wazwaz, a West Bank Palestinian who has conceded deportability, petitions for review of the decision of the United States Department of Justice Board of Immigration Appeals denying his requests for asylum and for withholding and suspension of deportation. See 8 U.S.C. Secs. 1158, 1252, 1253(h). Wazwaz argues that West Bank Palestinians are a recognizable persecuted class within the meaning of the Immigration and Nationality Act, and that as a Palestinian he has a well-founded fear of persecution and will suffer extreme hardship if forced to return to the Israeli-occupied West Bank.

After careful review of the record, we conclude that the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals is supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole. See Behzadpour v. United States, 946 F.2d 1351, 1353 (8th Cir. 1991). In particular, Wazwaz has failed to present evidence "so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could fail to find the requisite fear of persecution." INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 484 (1992).

The Board's decision is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Homai Behzadpour v. United States
946 F.2d 1351 (Eighth Circuit, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 F.3d 1226, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11601, 1995 WL 72308, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ayyoub-younes-wazwaz-v-immigration-and-naturalizat-ca8-1995.