Ayunwi Meme Fuh v. State
This text of Ayunwi Meme Fuh v. State (Ayunwi Meme Fuh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON
ORDER
Appellate case name: Ayunwi Meme Fuh v. The State of Texas
Appellate case numbers: 01-13-00494-CR
Trial court case numbers: 1354773
Trial court: 230th District Court of Harris County
Appellant, Ayunwi Meme Fuh, has filed a pro se “Application to Dismiss and/or a Personal Recognizance Bond” in his appeal. In his request, appellant asks that we “dismiss this case” against him or “grant and issue” a personal recognizance bond. We deny appellant’s pro se request to dismiss his case or issue a personal recognizance bond. Appellant is represented by counsel in this appeal. Appellant and his counsel should confer. If appellant no longer wishes to prosecute his appeal, appellant’s counsel should file a motion that complies with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) in the appeal. It is so ORDERED.
Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings Acting individually Acting for the Court
Date: December 23, 2014
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Ayunwi Meme Fuh v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ayunwi-meme-fuh-v-state-texapp-2014.