Ayton v. Bean

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ayton v. Bean

80 A.D.2d 839, 436 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10666

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 9, 1981

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 80 A.D.2d 839 (Ayton v. Bean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ayton v. Bean, 80 A.D.2d 839, 436 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10666 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to enjoin Long Island University from preventing petitioner from attending nursing classes, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 31, 1980, which, inter alia, directed Long Island University to “conduct a due process hearing at which petitioner can examine her papers, give testimony and cross examine witnesses”. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding dismissed on the merits. Special Term concluded that the “Uni[840]*840versity was justified in sending the letter * * * wherein the petitioner was advised that she would not be registered in nursing courses.” Nevertheless, finding that there had “been no due process hearing at which an official could go over the petitioner’s examination paper with her”, Special Term ordered such a hearing at which petitioner would have the rights to examine her papers, give testimony and cross-examine witnesses. Since this proceeding involves an academic decision by a private institution, Special Term erred in ordering a due process hearing. Petitioner was accorded every right to which she was entitled. Mangano, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to enjoin Long Island University from preventing petitioner from attending nursing classes, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated July 31, 1980, which, inter alia, directed Long Island University to “conduct a due process hearing at which petitioner can examine her papers, give testimony and cross examine witnesses”. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and proceeding dismissed on the merits. Special Term concluded that the “Uni[840]*840versity was justified in sending the letter * * * wherein the petitioner was advised that she would not be registered in nursing courses.” Nevertheless, finding that there had “been no due process hearing at which an official could go over the petitioner’s examination paper with her”, Special Term ordered such a hearing at which petitioner would have the rights to examine her papers, give testimony and cross-examine witnesses. Since this proceeding involves an academic decision by a private institution, Special Term erred in ordering a due process hearing. Petitioner was accorded every right to which she was entitled. Mangano, J. P., Rabin, Gulotta and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

80 A.D.2d 839, 436 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ayton-v-bean-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack