Home/New York Court of Chancery/Ayres v. Valentine

Ayres v. Valentine

2 Edw. Ch. 451, 1835 N.Y. LEXIS 264, 1835 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 14
CourtNew York Court of Chancery
DecidedApril 13, 1835
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2 Edw. Ch. 451 (Ayres v. Valentine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Chancery primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ayres v. Valentine, 2 Edw. Ch. 451, 1835 N.Y. LEXIS 264, 1835 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 14 (N.Y. 1835).

Opinion

The Vice-Chancellor:

The application to amend is based upon sufficient affidavits. I had a doubt how far amendment by striking out could be allowed. But here is a clerical error and the effect of what is wanted can be done by an interlineation. Take an order to amend correcting the date by interlineation, without prejudice to the injunction—serving a copy of the bill as amended gratis and paying the costs of the present motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kinney v. Emery
37 N.J. Eq. 339 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Edw. Ch. 451, 1835 N.Y. LEXIS 264, 1835 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 14, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ayres-v-valentine-nychanct-1835.