Ayres v. Valentine
2 Edw. Ch. 451, 1835 N.Y. LEXIS 264, 1835 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 14
Opinion
The application to amend is based upon sufficient affidavits. I had a doubt how far amendment by striking out could be allowed. But here is a clerical error and the effect of what is wanted can be done by an interlineation. Take an order to amend correcting the date by interlineation, without prejudice to the injunction—serving a copy of the bill as amended gratis and paying the costs of the present motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ayres v. Valentine, 2 Edw. Ch. 451, 1835 N.Y. LEXIS 264, 1835 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 14 (N.Y. 1835).
2 Edw. Ch. 451 (Ayres v. Valentine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Kinney v. Emery
37 N.J. Eq. 339 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1883)